Anitha Mareedu, 2025. "Machine Learning for Secure Network Traffic Analysis: From Flow Classification to Encrypted Threat Detection" ESP International Journal of Advancements in Computational Technology (ESP-IJACT) Volume 3, Issue 2: 64-74.
The growing adoption of encryption protocols such as TLS 1.3, QUIC, and DNS-over-HTTPS has limited the effectiveness of traditional deep packet inspection, challenging conventional methods of network traffic analysis. In response, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful alternative, enabling the analysis of encrypted and obfuscated traffic through side-channel features, flow metadata, and behavioral patterns. This review systematically examines the evolution of ML-based techniques for secure network traffic analysis, covering supervised flow classification, anomaly detection, and encrypted threat inference. We analyze key components such as feature extraction strategies, learning models, and benchmark datasets, and assess the effectiveness of ML-powered network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) in operational settings. Tools like Zeek, CICFlowMeter, and Suricata extensions are discussed in the context of practical deployment. Furthermore, the review addresses emerging challenges including data privacy, adversarial robustness, and model explainability. We conclude by identifying open research directions focused on integrating ML with threat intelligence, enhancing interpretability, and enabling scalable, privacy-preserving detection in modern enterprise environments.
[1] A. S. George, et al., "Innovative traffic management for enhanced cybersecurity in modern network environments," Partners Univ. Int. Res. J., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2024.
[2] J. Jangid and S. Malhotra, "Optimizing software upgrades in optical transport networks: Challenges and best practices," Nanotechnol. Percept., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 194–206, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://nano-ntp.com/index.php/nano/article/view/5169
[3] J. Jangid, S. Dixit, S. Malhotra, M. Saqib, F. Yashu, and D. Mehta, "Enhancing security and efficiency in wireless mobile networks through blockchain," Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. Eng., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 958–969, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/7309
[4] M. Çelebi, A. Özbilen, and U. Yavanoğlu, "A comprehensive survey on deep packet inspection for advanced network traffic analysis: Issues and challenges," Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Univ. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2023.
[5] Y. Zou, et al., "A survey on wireless security: Technical challenges, recent advances, and future trends," Proc. IEEE, vol. 104, no. 9, pp. 1727–1765, 2016.
[6] J. Jangid, "Secure microservice communication in optical networks," J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Manage., vol. 10, no. 21s, 2025. doi: 10.52783/jisem.v10i21s.3455
[7] A. Bachir, et al., "A signature and NLP-based network traffic detection model for SQL injections for enhancing web security," in Proc. 2024 IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Big Data Comput., Appl. Technol. (BDCAT), IEEE, 2024.
[8] W. J. Buchanan and W. J. Buchanan, "Networking types," in The Handbook of Data Communications and Networks: Volume 1. Volume 2, pp. 743–769, 2004.
[9] Y. Yan, "Machine learning fundamentals," in Machine Learning in Chemical Safety and Health: Fundamentals with Applications, pp. 19–46, 2022.
[10] J. Jangid, "Efficient training data caching for deep learning in edge computing networks," Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 337–362, 2020. doi: 10.32628/CSEIT20631113
[11] T. T. T. Nguyen and G. Armitage, "A survey of techniques for internet traffic classification using machine learning," IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 56–76, 2008.
[12] A. Ghosh and A. Senthilrajan, "Classifying network traffic using DPI and DFI," Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1019, 2019.
[13] M. M. Raikar, et al., "Data traffic classification in software defined networks (SDN) using supervised-learning," Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 171, pp. 2750–2759, 2020.
[14] A. N. Mahmood, et al., "Network traffic analysis and SCADA security," in Handbook of Information and Communication Security, pp. 383–405, 2010.
[15] H. Whitworth, et al., "5G aviation networks using novel AI approach for DDoS detection," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 77518–77542, 2023.
[16] M. Abolfathi, Enhancing Encrypted Network Traffic Security Against Advanced Traffic Analysis Attacks, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Colorado at Denver, 2024.
[17] G. Skibyak, Kitsune: A Look into the Lasting Presence of the Fox Spirit in Japanese Culture, M.S. thesis, New Mexico State Univ., 2020.
[18] T. Jager, J. Schwenk, and J. Somorovsky, "On the security of TLS 1.3 and QUIC against weaknesses in PKCS#1 v1.5 encryption," in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conf. Comput. Commun. Security, 2015.
[19] T. Böttger, et al., "An empirical study of the cost of DNS-over-HTTPS," in Proc. Internet Meas. Conf., 2019.
[20] T. Furlong, Tools, Data, and Flow Attributes for Understanding Network Traffic Without Payload, Ph.D. dissertation, Carleton Univ., 2007.
[21] E. Cagli, Feature Extraction for Side-Channel Attacks, Ph.D. dissertation, Sorbonne Univ., 2018.
[22] K. Bhargavan, V. Cheval, and C. Wood, Handshake Privacy for TLS 1.3—Technical Report, Diss. Inria Paris; Cloudflare, 2022.
[23] J. Zhou, et al., "Challenges and advances in analyzing TLS 1.3-encrypted traffic: A comprehensive survey," Electronics, vol. 13, no. 20, p. 4000, 2024.
[24] X. Wu, et al., "An adaptive federated learning scheme with differential privacy preserving," Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 127, pp. 362–372, 2022.
[25] V. Gustavsson, Machine Learning for a Network-Based Intrusion Detection System: An Application Using Zeek and the CICIDS2017 Dataset, 2019.
Machine Learning (ML), Encrypted Traffic Analysis, Intrusion Detection (NIDS), TLS 1.3, QUIC, Federated Learning, Explainable AI (XAI).