Citation :

Shashank Pasupuleti, 2024. "Designing Human-Robot Interaction Interfaces For Safe And Efficient Medical Robotics" ESP International Journal of Advancements in Science & Technology (ESP-IJAST) Volume 2, Issue 3: 74-81.

Abstract :

The integration of robotics into the medical field has resulted in significant advancements, especially in minimally invasive surgery, rehabilitation, and diagnostics. Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) interfaces play a critical role in the success of these robotic systems, serving as the bridge between medical professionals and robots. Effective interface design is essential for ensuring the safety, efficiency, and comfort of medical practitioners, which directly impacts patient outcomes. This paper explores the theoretical foundations of HRI interfaces, focusing on cognitive and psychological factors, usability principles, and human factors engineering within the medical robotics domain. The design considerations for user types, interface modalities, customization, error prevention, and autonomy levels are also discussed. Additionally, the paper outlines the methodologies involved in developing, testing, and refining HRI interfaces. Real-world data and performance metrics are provided to evaluate the impact of interface designs on user performance and safety.

References :

[1] Booth, K., et al. (2019). Designing for Medical Robotics: Human Factors and Usability Engineering. Springer.

[2] Carayon, P., et al. (2019). "Human Factors in Healthcare: The Need for Interdisciplinary Design." Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 29(5), 401-415.

[3] Chittaro, L., et al. (2019). "Prototyping in Medical Robotics: Methods and Applications." Journal of Robotics Research, 38(7), 689-704.

[4] Draper, S., et al. (2018). Cognitive Load and User Interface Design for Healthcare Applications. Wiley.

[5] Gould, J.D., & Lewis, C. (1985). "Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think." Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 300-311.

[6] Mehta, S., et al. (2015). "Customizable Interfaces in Medical Robotics: A User-Centered Approach." Journal of Healthcare Robotics, 11(2), 123-135.

[7] Mott, S., et al. (2020). "The Future of Robotic Surgery: Interface Design and Autonomy." Journal of Robotic Surgery, 14(1), 9-17.

[8] Norman, D.A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books.

[9] Pope, C., et al. (2018). "Qualitative Study of Surgeon Interaction with Robotic Systems." Surgical Innovation, 25(2), 89-97.

[10] Shneiderman, B., et al. (2016). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson Education.

[11] Sweller, J. (1988). "Cognitive Load During Problem-Solving: Effects on Learning." Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.

[12] Yuan, Y., et al. (2020). "Multimodal Interfaces for Medical Robotics." IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 36(5), 1371-1385.

[13] Zhao, X., et al. (2021). "Real-Time Feedback Systems in Robotic Surgery." International Journal of Robotics Research, 40(7), 778-791.

[14] Booth, J. C., et al. (2019). Real-Time Feedback in Robotic Surgery: Improving User Performance. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 13(3), 439-447.

[15] Yuan, Y., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2020). A Survey of Human-Robot Interaction in Robotic Surgery: Current Status and Future Directions. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 62(4), 347-358.

Keywords :

Human-Robot Interaction, Medical Robotics, Interface Design, Usability, Cognitive Factors, Haptic Feedback, Real-Time Feedback, Autonomy Levels, Error Prevention, User-Centered Design, Robotic Surgery, Interaction Modalities, Customizable Interfaces, User Testing, Safety Metrics, Surgical Robotics, Interface Usability, Performance Metrics, Healthcare Robotics, Robotic-Assisted Surgery, Cognitive Load, Decision-Making, Multimodal Interfaces, System Integration, Human Factors Engineering, Ergonomic Interface Design, Interface Customization, Robotic Rehabilitation, Feedback Loops.